Transparency in government. It’s a popular phrase these days. Perhaps it resonates even stronger in McAlester, given our recent past city government that was anything but. You’d have a hard time finding any local politician including, I suspect, any of our current councilmen who wouldn’t swear fealty to the concept. That’s why the council’s recent decision to ignore Oklahoma’s Open Meeting Act was so disappointing.
I am referring to the executive session held by the council behind closed doors on December 1 (“City council votes to furlough employees” — McAlester News-Capital, Dec. 2, 2009). The session was held in order to privately discuss and decide upon various cost-cutting measures to shore up the city’s budget. Although the Notice of Meeting did not specify what topics would be covered in the secret session (a violation of the Act), this newspaper did some digging and informed the public the day before (“Council to decide on furloughs for city workers” — Nov. 30, 2009).
Upon returning to open session, the mayor made a series of five motions that were quickly seconded and passed without discussion — thus confirming what went on behind closed doors. Officially, the city invoked an exception to the Open Meeting Act that allows (but does not require) the convening of an executive session to discuss “negotiations concerning employees and representatives of employee groups.” This exception exists so that governing bodies can privately discuss matters related to collective bargaining. Cities would be disadvantaged if their strategy sessions on union negotiations were required to be conducted in public. Therefore, in this limited case, the potential harm to the public (through more costly collective bargaining agreements) outweighs the general premise that “the process of decision making as well as the end results must be conducted in full view of the governed.” (Oklahoma Association of Municipal Attorneys v. Derryberry, Okla., 577 P. 2d 1310, 1313-14 (1978))
Joey Senat, an associate professor of journalism at Oklahoma State University and a former president of Freedom of Information Oklahoma, states that our city council failed “when they hid from the public their nearly two-hour discussion of how to address the city’s budget problems.” Mr. Senat, an expert on open government, has posted his findings and opinions on this matter for those who wish to know more at foioklahoma.blogspot.com. He concludes by noting “No exemption exists to allow public bodies to discuss budget issues in secret. Other exemptions cannot be used as a subterfuge to conduct such discussions behind closed doors.”
Trust in government has been and continues to be a huge issue in McAlester. Misdeeds by past councils color the public’s perception of today’s council, like it or not. Surely the council can see that attempting to justify this executive session as somehow being within the letter of the law is counterproductive to changing that public perception for the better. Even if a nuanced legal argument could be concocted, in my opinion there is not a shadow of a doubt that it violated the spirit of the law.
My hope is that in the future the council will look for reasons to hold discussions “in full view of the governed” rather than looking for reasons to hide them. Perhaps then we can start to believe in transparency in government.
Steve Harrison is a McAlester resident and served as McAlester’s interim treasurer.
Editorials
A closed door is not transparent
Guest column
- Editorials
-
-
Cutting the budget blindfolded
The same month that Congress cut one trillion dollars from the defense budget, satellite photos revealed that blackened holes had replaced two buildings at a remote Iranian military facility.
-
Good night, Carol
There is a song from one of my favorite Broadway musicals — “Wicked” — that is called “For Good.” The words are between two friends. “Because I knew you I have been changed for good.” Today I say goodbye to someone who definitely changed me for good.
-
In our view: Check yes 3 times on Tuesday's ballot
Tuesday’s McAlester election is all about money.
-
It’s the end of an era
News that the McAlester News-Capital’s press would be shutting down Oct. 3 was like a kick to the gut. Several weeks later, the news still stings; ever more so for the men and women we will no longer see traipsing through the newsroom every morning, or smiling as they bring us those first copies of the daily paper, still wet with ink.
That era ends next week. -
Justice rules in records debate
McAlester’s own state Supreme Court justice recently went against the majority on the high court, which consists of some of the sharpest legal minds in Oklahoma. We couldn’t be more proud.
-
In our view: It's time to be heard on school bond
It looks as though McAlester’s school district will attempt another bond measure — funded by property taxes — to repair leaking roofs and broken stadium seats, and vacate old buildings, among other things.
-
New hospital CEO will be welcome addition
McAlester Regional Health Center’s board of directors is expected to announce soon who will be hired as the new chief executive officer.
We welcome the addition. -
Elaine Jeanette McIntosh
Elaine Jeanette McIntosh, 62, of Talihina, died Wednesday, July 13, 2011, at Sparks Regional Medical Center in Fort Smith, Ark.
-
In our view: U.S. not a relic of the past
A little over nine years ago, I walked into my second hour class just in time to look at the television mounted on the wall and see the second plane hit the World Trade Center.
-
Our view: Court ruling boosts Constitution, not Westboro
This week’s high court ruling allowing protesters to loudly proclaim messages of hate and retribution during the funerals of fallen soldiers is hard to swallow.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
Cutting the budget blindfolded




